Bot Access Governance
Verifies that AI training crawlers and real-time search bots have explicit, non-conflicting robots.txt rules.
Enter a domain to measure your site readiness across all 18 engines.
Crawlability, semantic comprehension, and verifiable machine interfaces.
We do not claim 100% readiness guarantees ChatGPT citations. Citations depend on model training and search relevance.
We do not invent fake MCP or A2A capabilities just to artificially inflate scores.
Website AI Readiness is the technical state of a site that allows AI models and autonomous agents to crawl, understand, and cite its content accurately.
No. llms.txt is an evolving proposal that guides LLMs to clean markdown documentation. It is evaluated with appropriate weight under PROPOSAL status.
Yes. The free audit provides exact issues, affected URLs, and evidence snippets. For automated remediation contracts, use the $99 Yol Haritası.
Recommendation opportunity is not created by one file. GEO + AEO + LLMO + AAO + RAG + E-E-A-T + llms.txt + sitemaps + technical SEO are different parts of one discovery and trust chain.
robots.txt, sitemaps, canonicals, indexability and AI crawler access form the discovery foundation.
GEO, AEO, LLMO, entity graphs, schema and answer extractability reduce machine ambiguity.
RAG/retrieval, original information, E-E-A-T, freshness and evidence support source eligibility.
AAO, accessible journeys, intact links, measurable referrals and clear CTAs connect AI discovery to commercial action.
Recommendations, rankings, citations, traffic, customers and revenue are not guaranteed. HTML&HTML measures website-side technical and content blockers; it does not claim control over external AI systems.